SupremeCourt

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, March 3, 2013

December 2012: Controller's decisions at the IPO

Posted on 12:06 PM by Unknown
In the month of December 2012 the Controller's offices issued 84 decisions.  Out of these 84, 46 decisions were granted (including deferred, time allowed), 34 refused (including revoked, abandoned and withdrawn) and no file uploaded for the remainder (4).
Some interesting decisions: There are three decisions related to divisional practice: 1251/KOL/2005; 1257/DEL/2007, and 3466/DEL/2005: All three are from different controllers, and yield a similar result.  1576/DEL/2006 is on application of sections 3(e), and 3(p). 106/DELNP/2008 is on application of section 3(d).  402/CHENP/2004 deals with revocation of Schering's patent.  

APPLICATION NUMBER APPLICANT Decision / Issue CONTROLLER
1403/CHENP/2008 BASF SE Refused Anoop K Joy
3489/CHENP/2006 SUMITOMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES LTD Granted Anoop K Joy
3376/CHENP/2006 KURARAY SPECIALITIES EUROPE GMBH Refused Anoop K Joy
2918/CHENP/2006 OSAKA INDUSTRIAL PROMO ORG. Granted Anoop K Joy
1251/KOL/2006 OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO.,LTD. Refused Bhaskar Ghosh
3919/CHENP/2006 MASCHINENFABRIK RIETER AG Granted C N Shashidhara
101/CHENP/2008 TERRACON TECHNOLOGIES LLC Granted C N Shashidhara
3386/DELNP/2004 THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE Abandoned Dr N. Mukherjee
1576/DEL/2006 CENTRAL ... UNANI MEDICINE Refused* Dr N. Mukherjee
1141/MUMNP/2009 F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG Abandoned Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
1383/MUMNP/2007 GILEAD SCIENCES INC. Abandoned Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
1907/MUMNP/2007 THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS Abandoned Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
559/MUMNP/2007 DISCUS DENTAL IMPRESSIONS INC. Abandoned Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
220/MUMNP/2009 SEWON CELLONTECH CO.  LTD. Abandoned Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
48/MUMNP/2010 HADASIT MEDICAL RESEARCH  Abandoned Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
2006/MUMNP/2008 MOLOGIC LTD Granted Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
2775/MUMNP/2008 THE CONCENTRATE MFG. CO. IRELAND Abandoned Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
1198/MUM/2007 INSTITUTE OF IMMUNOHAEMATOLOGY Granted Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
337/DELNP/2003 LANXESS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH Granted Dr.Rajesh Dixit
4069/DELNP/2006 RANBAXY LABORATORIES LIMITED Withdrawn Hardev Karar
106/DELNP/2008 ALFA WASSERMANN S. P. A. Granted* Hardev Karar
88/CHE/2006 K. GURUMOORTHY Granted K S Hariram
564/DELNP/2007 GE HEALTHCARE UK LIMITED Abandoned Monika Yadav
242/DEL/2008 MILLIPORE CORPORATION Abandoned Monika Yadav
1458/DELNP/2006 Tenneco Automotive Operating Company Inc. Granted Mr. Naveen Mathur
2083/MUM/2007 OMNIACTIVE HEALTH TECH Granted N. Ramchander
285/MUM/2009 NATWARLAL J. MEHTA Granted N. Ramchander
372/MUMNP/2008 UNIVERSITY OF MONTPELLIER I Granted N. Ramchander
1294/MUMNP/2006 ANGSTROM POWER INCORPORATED Granted N.K.MOHANTY
2027/MUM/2006 MEDIA TEK INC. Granted* N.K.MOHANTY
655/MUMNP/2006 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED Refused* N.K.MOHANTY
215/MUMNP/2008 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED Granted N.K.MOHANTY
807/MUMNP/2006 ESSIG, JOHN, RAYMOND Abandoned N.K.MOHANTY
1535/MUMNP/2007 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED Granted N.K.MOHANTY
126/MUM/2008 OERLIKON TEXTILE GMBH & CO. KG Granted N.K.MOHANTY
821/MUM/2004 MULTIMEDIA GLORY SDN. BHD. Granted N.K.MOHANTY
19/MUMNP/2008 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED Granted N.K.MOHANTY
260/MUMNP/2008 QUALCOMM INCORPORATED Granted N.K.MOHANTY
63/MUMNP/2008 HUMAX CO., LTD. Granted N.K.MOHANTY
1257/DEL/2007 GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. Refused* N.R.Meena
840/DELNP/2007 LG CHEM.LTD., Granted N.R.Meena
2393/DELNP/2006 MAGNESIUM ELEKTRON LIMITED Granted N.R.Meena
2083/KOLNP/2006 MOTOROLA, INC. Granted Nirmalya Sinha
494/DELNP/2006 SULZER PUMPEN AG, Granted P S Rao
137/DELNP/2006 MICHELIN RECHERCHE S.A. Granted P S Rao
547/CHE/2006 AUROBINDO PHARMA LIMITED Refused P. Rajanbabu
1039/CHENP/2008 F. HOFFAMANN-LA ROCHE AG Granted P. Rajanbabu
1424/CHENP/2008 EISAI R&D MANAGEMENT CO, LTD Granted P. Rajanbabu
2092/CHE/2007 D. K. KRISHNA MURTHY Granted P. Rajanbabu
821/MUM/2005 RIETER INGOLSTADT AG Abandoned Pankaj Borkar
1617/MUM/2005 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED Abandoned Pankaj Borkar
2082/MUM/2007 MANROLAND AG Abandoned Pankaj Borkar
68/MUM/2004 HONDA MOTOR CO. LTD. Granted Pankaj Borkar
1987/MUMNP/2007 ZF FRIEDRICHSHAFEN AG Granted Pankaj Borkar
1525/KOLNP/2006 FUJIKURA LTD. Granted Parijat Sourav
2820/CHENP/2006 ABB OY Abandoned S Thangapandian
877/KOL/2005 ALSTOM TECHNOLOGY LTD Refused Santanu Dey
1077/DEL/2005 KANISHK SINHA Refused*  Saroj Kumar
1077/DEL/2005 KANISHK SINHA Granted* Saroj Kumar
1686/DEL/2005 WORTHINGTON ARMSTRONG VENTURE Granted Saroj Kumar
3612/DELNP/2007 LG CHEM, LTD., No file uploaded Sh.S.N.Sav
3466/DEL/2005 RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED Refused* Sh.S.N.Sav
902/DEL/2007 RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED No file uploaded Sh.S.N.Sav
2403/DELNP/2006 IBM No file uploaded Sh.S.N.Sav
1395/DELNP/2007 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION No file uploaded Sh.S.N.Sav
829/DELNP/2007 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY Refused Shah Alam
1106/KOLNP/2006 CENTOCOR, INC. Granted Soumen Ghosh
5179/KOLNP/2008 GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS S.A. Abandoned Soumen Ghosh
3889/KOLNP/2007 DR. WILLMAR SCHWABE GMBH Abandoned Soumen Ghosh
402/CHENP/2004 SCHERING CORPORATION Revoked T V Madhusudhan
3969/CHENP/2007 TAIYO KAGAKU CO., LTD Granted* T V Madhusudhan
3497/CHENP/2006 VAAKYA TECHNOLOGIES  Granted V Saravanan
2894/CHENP/2007 SILVERBROOK RESEARCH PTY LTD Abandoned V Saravanan
623/MUMNP/2006 OBSCHESTO S OGRANICHENNOI  Granted Vikash Sharma
560/MUMNP/2006 Approtec USA Refused Vikash Sharma
560/MUMNP/2006 Approtec USA Refused Vikash Sharma
77/MUM/2004 HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD., Granted Vikash Sharma
92/MUM/2006 MAN ROLAND AG Refused Vikash Sharma
24/MUMNP/2008 SIEGENIA - AUBI KG Granted Vikash Sharma
1741/MUMNP/2007 GLATT GMBH Granted Vikash Sharma
2318/MUM/2007 TATA MOTORS LIMITED Granted Vikash Sharma
2309/MUM/2007 TATA MOTORS LIMITED Granted Vikash Sharma
1114/DEL/2005 ADESS SINGH Granted Vinod Kumar
2552/DELNP/2004 FENWAL INC., Granted Vinod Kumar
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Controller's decisions, patent agent exam, Patent Strategies, Rajiv | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • IPAB on Payyannur Ring
    [*S lightly long post] Background: The Intellectual Property Appellate Board (“ IPAB ”), in its recent order in SubhashJewellery v. Payyan...
  • Guest Post: Intermediary liability in defamation cases - Parle, Mouthshut & Visakha cases to clarify the law
    Chaitanya Ramachandran, who has blogged for us previously over here and here , has sent us this excellent guest post analyzing the extent of...
  • Delhi HC rejects the "Hot News" Doctrine: A Summary
    The applicability of the Hot News doctrine was rejected recently in a landmark ruling delivered by Justice Bhat of the Delhi HC. This post i...
  • IP Research Assistant position at IIT, Madras
    Feroz Ali Khader, MHRD IP Chair at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras, is looking for research assistants to work on various is...
  • Satyajit Ray's sketches and copyright controversies
    A copyright row appears to have started between the Satyajit Ray Society and the Delhi Art Gallery, that is organising a countrywide exhibit...
  • Dorling Kindersley v. Sanguine Technical Publishers
    A recent Delhi High Court order passed on 21 January, 2013  with respect to copyright licensing has come to our notice. An analysis of the j...
  • Call for Papers: IIT Bombay and MHRD jointly announce the 2nd International Conference on Management of Intellectual Property and Strategy
    The readers may be interested to know that the Shailesh J. Mehta School of Management of IIT Bombay is geared up to host, in collaboration w...
  • SpicyIP Tidbit: ALCS August Distribution
    In the UK, the Authors' Licensing and Collecting Society is an organization run and owned by writers that collects money due to its mem...
  • Aaron Swartz, RIP
    See Cory Doctorow's eulogy here Some of us in India may not have heard of Aaron Swartz, a 26 year old activist who was heavily involved ...
  • Thalappakatti biryani trademark row
    The southern district of Dindigal in Tamil Nadu occupies a special place in the hearts of biryani lovers. In the late 1950s, one Nagasamy N...

Categories

  • 126 (1)
  • 3(d) (4)
  • 3(f) (1)
  • 3(i) (1)
  • 3(k) (2)
  • Academic Writing (1)
  • access (10)
  • access to food (1)
  • access to health (3)
  • AIA (1)
  • AIDS/HIV (3)
  • Antitrust (2)
  • Bajaj v LML (1)
  • Basmati Row (2)
  • Biological Diversity (5)
  • Biologics (2)
  • biopiracy (4)
  • biotech (7)
  • Bollywood (25)
  • Broadcasters Rights (5)
  • Budget (1)
  • business method patent (2)
  • Call for papers (2)
  • Cipla (2)
  • Comparative Advertising (4)
  • Competition law (8)
  • Compulsory Licensing (27)
  • condonation of delay (1)
  • Conference (4)
  • Constitution (12)
  • Contracts (1)
  • Controller's decisions (8)
  • Copyright (112)
  • Copyright Amendment Bill 2010 (23)
  • copyright board (4)
  • Copyright Exceptions (6)
  • copyright office (1)
  • Copyright Rules (2013) (5)
  • Copyright Societies (9)
  • Counterfeiting (1)
  • creativity (1)
  • Cross Retaliation (1)
  • csir (4)
  • d (1)
  • D.U. Photocopy Case (16)
  • Darjeeling Tea (3)
  • Data Exclusivity (2)
  • Database (1)
  • DCGI (2)
  • decompilation (2)
  • defamation (9)
  • Designs (3)
  • Designs Act (3)
  • Differential Pricing (2)
  • Dilution (1)
  • Disabilities (3)
  • Disability (2)
  • DMCA (2)
  • Doha Declaration (1)
  • Domain Names (2)
  • Draft Policy of the Indian Government (2)
  • DRM (1)
  • Drug Regulation (7)
  • education (12)
  • Enercon (1)
  • Enforcement (1)
  • EU (2)
  • ex parte (2)
  • exhaustion (3)
  • Exhaustion of Rights (2)
  • Fair Dealing (8)
  • Fair Use (11)
  • Federal Circuit (1)
  • Fees (3)
  • FICCI (7)
  • FRAND (2)
  • free trade agreement (3)
  • FTA (3)
  • G.I. Registry (4)
  • gene sequences (3)
  • Generic medicine (4)
  • Geographical Indication (14)
  • Gilead (1)
  • Glenmark (5)
  • Gopika (34)
  • Guest post (11)
  • guidelines (1)
  • GWU-CII (1)
  • Herceptin (1)
  • hot news (3)
  • ICANN (1)
  • incremental innovation (1)
  • independence (1)
  • india (5)
  • Indian Government (1)
  • Indian patent litigation (27)
  • Indian Pharma (35)
  • Injunction (10)
  • Innovation (7)
  • INTA (1)
  • Intermediaries (10)
  • internet (11)
  • Internet Access Providers (IAPs) (5)
  • Internet Censorship (7)
  • IP scholarship (3)
  • IP aware (4)
  • IP Course (3)
  • IP Education (1)
  • IP Policy (11)
  • IP update (4)
  • ip writing competition (1)
  • IPAB (34)
  • ipchair (1)
  • IPO (1)
  • IPRS (5)
  • IT Act (1)
  • Journal (2)
  • judicial independence (3)
  • Jurisdiction (1)
  • Kruttika (4)
  • Legal Education (3)
  • Legal Research Tools (1)
  • Legal Scholarship (2)
  • library (2)
  • Licensing (7)
  • Madhulika (20)
  • mathematical methods (1)
  • Media law (3)
  • medical method (1)
  • Merck (4)
  • mhrd ip chair (1)
  • Microsoft (3)
  • Middle Path (1)
  • Moral Rights (2)
  • Movies (18)
  • musical work (2)
  • nanotechnology (1)
  • Natco (3)
  • natco defamation suit (5)
  • natco vs bayer (4)
  • need for transparency (1)
  • Novartis (8)
  • Novartis patent case in India (11)
  • NPEs (2)
  • nujs (1)
  • NUJS Conference (2)
  • Obituary (1)
  • obviousness (7)
  • Off-Topic (2)
  • online course (4)
  • Open Access (6)
  • Open Source (2)
  • Opposition (3)
  • Parallel Imports (4)
  • Parliament (1)
  • passing off (5)
  • Patent (52)
  • Patent act (10)
  • patent agent (5)
  • patent agent exam (9)
  • patent agent exam qualifications (3)
  • patent infringement (5)
  • Patent Licensing (2)
  • Patent litigation (2)
  • Patent Office (19)
  • patent pool (3)
  • Patent Prosecution (7)
  • Patent rules (2)
  • Patent Strategies (8)
  • Patents (9)
  • pegasus (1)
  • Personality Rights (1)
  • Pfizer (1)
  • Pharma (18)
  • Piracy (5)
  • plagiarism (3)
  • Plant Variety Protection (2)
  • post grant (1)
  • Prashant (2)
  • Preventive Detention (1)
  • Price Control (6)
  • prior publication (1)
  • Privacy (3)
  • Prizes (1)
  • public health (3)
  • Public Interest (4)
  • Publicity Rights (4)
  • Publishing (3)
  • radio (2)
  • Rajiv (18)
  • Rectification Petition (2)
  • Rejection (1)
  • research (3)
  • reverse engineering (2)
  • revocation (4)
  • rip (1)
  • Roche (2)
  • Roche vs Cipla (1)
  • Royalty (2)
  • RTI (2)
  • Scholarship (4)
  • section 16 (1)
  • Section 3(d) (7)
  • section 8 (6)
  • shamnad (11)
  • Shan Kohli (4)
  • Shouvik Kumar Guha (30)
  • Smartphones/Tablets (2)
  • Social Innovation (1)
  • Software (10)
  • software enforcement (3)
  • software patent (3)
  • Special 301 Report (1)
  • Spicy Tidbits (6)
  • spicyip (1)
  • SpicyIP Accolades (1)
  • SpicyIP Announcements (9)
  • SpicyIP Case (1)
  • SpicyIP Cases (3)
  • spicyip commiseration (1)
  • SpicyIP Events (11)
  • SpicyIP Fellowship (5)
  • SpicyIP Guest Series (22)
  • SpicyIP Interview (2)
  • SpicyIP Jobs (4)
  • SpicyIP Jobs/General (2)
  • SpicyIP Review (1)
  • SpicyIP Tidbits (11)
  • SpicyIP Weekly Review (27)
  • Statutory Licensing (1)
  • STI Policy 2013 (4)
  • Sugen (3)
  • Supreme Court of India (5)
  • Swaraj (19)
  • Tarnishment (1)
  • Technology (6)
  • Technology Transfer (5)
  • TKDL (5)
  • TPP (1)
  • trade (4)
  • Trade Secret Protection (1)
  • Trademark (59)
  • Trademark dilution (1)
  • Trademark Registry (9)
  • Traditional Knowledge (7)
  • Transparency (5)
  • treaty (1)
  • trial (1)
  • tribunals (2)
  • TRIPS (11)
  • UK (3)
  • unfair competition (5)
  • UNFCCC (1)
  • Universities Research and Innovation Bill (2)
  • US (1)
  • US Patent Reform (1)
  • US Supreme Court (3)
  • viva (3)
  • WIPO (5)
  • Working a Patent (2)
  • Workshop (4)
  • writ (1)
  • WTO (1)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (364)
    • ►  September (13)
    • ►  August (41)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (36)
    • ►  May (32)
    • ►  April (51)
    • ▼  March (66)
      • US Department of Justice conducts review of IPXI
      • Public health activists lose challenge against Gil...
      • Bombay HC restrains the release of any trailers/te...
      • SpicyIP Tidbit: Viacom restrained from using 'Naut...
      • Recent decision on Protection of Plant Varieties A...
      • Ericsson sues Micromax over SEPs in 100-crore Pate...
      • Full Bench Delhi HC (Design Act)- Reckitt Benkise...
      • Guest Post: U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments in ...
      • Patent Office publishes final version of Guideline...
      • Joint Committees related to Trademark Matters
      • SpicyIP Weekly Review (March- Week 4)
      • Copyright Constitutionality Challenges
      • Statistics of patent grants in India
      • Breaking News: India's Copyright Amendments Challe...
      • Copyright Rules, 2013 designed to fail the Copyrig...
      • Copy of the Copyright Rules, 2013
      • 'Mad Men' controversy
      • A clarification on the Fox-‘Knockout’ copyright di...
      • The recent AMUL-IMUL trademark controversy
      • India’s patent policy: Big Pharma’s grouse?
      • Pratibha Syntex lawsuit still pending before the D...
      • SpicyIP Tidbit: An IP Thriller from an IP lawyer
      • US Supreme Court Supports Parallel Imports: Lesson...
      • IPAB’s first CL decision, resounding emphasis on p...
      • Government notifies Copyright Rules, 2013
      • SpicyIP Weekly Review (March Week 3)
      • Knock(ed) Out!
      • US Patent Reform - 2013: A brief look at the AIA
      • Breaking News: Second Compulsory Licensing Applica...
      • Zanjeer Remake Row before the Bombay HC
      • Guest Post: Kallam Anji Reddy: 1941 - 2013
      • EU Human Rights Court justifies The Pirate Bay con...
      • Breaking Hot News: Madras High Court strikes down ...
      • DU Photocopy Case: Academicians and Authors expres...
      • Bombay HC: Publication of Examination Report on we...
      • Breaking "Hot" News: A "Star" Win for Unfair Compe...
      • The role played by Microsoft in getting California...
      • An outrageous Californian attempt at extra-territo...
      • Standing Committee Report on ‘The Universities Res...
      • Standing Committee Report on ‘The Universities Res...
      • Spicy IP Weekly Review: March 2nd Week
      • Latest update from Campaign for affordable trastuz...
      • A recent study shows that U.S. firms don’t actuall...
      • A Tantalising Copyright Offer: Lessons from Canada...
      • Auditing the worldwide litigation involving ‘Basma...
      • ‘Rethinking the data exclusivity debate in India’ ...
      • UOI v. Malhotra Book Depot- restoration of trademark.
      • Call for Papers: IIT Bombay and MHRD jointly annou...
      • Guest Post: Eye witness account of India's first c...
      • Guest Post: Eye witness account of India's first c...
      • Bombay High Court – Are courts allowed to examine ...
      • Life of P.I. - Keynote address by Justice Prabha S...
      • SpicyIP Event: Announcing Expert Speaker Panel for...
      • SpicyIP Tidbit: Saregama loses copyright claim for...
      • Guest Post: Book Review - V.J. Taraporevala, Law o...
      • Blocking order issued against six UK ISP's by Engl...
      • Film release strategies and anti-competitive pract...
      • Compulsory Licensing is Not a Bad Word!
      • ‘First set up the labs, then dream the Nobel’
      • Spicy IP Weekly review (March Week 1)
      • December 2012: Controller's decisions at the IPO
      • Patents vs. Patients: Department of Pharmaceutical...
      • SpicyIP Tidbit: ViiV Healthcare collaborates with ...
      • Breaking News: Student Association Impleaded in Ac...
      • Kerala State Central Library digitizes Rare Books ...
      • Bombay High Court Decision on Trademark Infringeme...
    • ►  February (40)
    • ►  January (49)
  • ►  2012 (131)
    • ►  December (29)
    • ►  November (42)
    • ►  October (50)
    • ►  September (10)
Powered by Blogger.