SupremeCourt

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Part I: Digitization of content: a comparative analysis of growth trends in the music, film and television industries.

Posted on 9:07 PM by Unknown

This post consists of two parts. Both parts examine the impact of digitization on the entertainment industry. The first part analyzes the growth patterns of the music industry (international as well as domestic). The second part analyzes the growth trends of the international and domestic, film and television industry. The conclusion seeks to show that inspite of digitization the entertainment industry is doing well in terms of output, revenues and creativity.

Across the globe policy makers are coming to terms with digitization of content and are beginning to realize that a digital copyright reform is a necessity and no longer an option. This realization stems from the recent proliferation of digital content and the tremendous socio-economic benefits associated with such a trend. Digitization of creative industries has lead to increased competitiveness, job creation and economic growth. This is evidenced by studies that note (here) – “The cost of non-digital Europe is significant: according to a recent study, the EU could gain 4% GDP by stimulating the fast development of the digital single market by 2020. This corresponds to a gain of almost EUR 500 billion and means that the digital single market alone could have an impact similar to the 1992 internal market program.”
Statistics collected by the report ‘The Sky is Rising’[1] (hereinafter ‘the report’) show a marked increase in music, books, video and video game sales and output in countries like the US, UK, France, Germany, Spain  and Russia, inspite of digitization of content. These statistics buttress the premise that digitization has lead not only to economic growth of the entertainment industry but also increased creativity and diversity within this industry.

Growth trends of the Music Industry: comparative analysis  
The report showed that contrary to common assumptions, the music industry is not dying or waning due to digitization. As evidenced in the report, music production is at an all time high- “Globally, the media metadata service Gracenote has indexed over 130 million music tracks, and over the years, it has been adding about 10-15 million songs to its database in a remarkably consistent manner, year after year.”[2]

Not only is music produced by famous recording labels and professional artists increasing but also music produced by amateur artists.[3]This was evidenced by a simple search on YouTube for ‘cover song’ which produced tens of thousands of results.[4]This goes to show that diversity in music is on a rise thus leading to more creative output. Also, as pointed out in the report, diversity is increasing not only with an increase in number of amateur artists but also increasing with regard to the creation of new genres of music. [5]Such diversity, therefore, presents an opportunity to the music industry to tap into the growing talent and take advantage of this diverse market.

Music production in India is also rapidly increasing. Amateur artists in India are fast growing and a similar, but more specific YouTube search for ‘cover song Indians’ produces 21,000 results, ‘cover songs Hindi’ produces around 50,000 results, are only indicative of the potential and diversity the Indian music industry has at its disposal. Given that India has several regional languages, has a Bollywood, a Sandalwood, a Kollywood and a Tollywood!, the number of amateur artists simply making cover songs is obviously enormous. Moreover, shows like the ‘Indian Idol’ promote amateur singers showing thereby that more yet-to-be-famous singers are getting publicity via non-traditional media outlets. The various ways new technologies and methods allow exposure of talent is important for any music industry and as the report points out, completely excluding this increasing pool of talent (no matter how untalented they may be in the “deep end”) would miss out on where the music industry is going and how it may spread in the future.[6]

With regard to music revenues, it has been reported that “globally, the recorded music industry is transitioning to selling more digital music (rather than physical media), and the revenues from digital songs are starting to match up to the revenues from physical media sales”.[7]

The table, using statistics from the report,[8] shows that digital music revenues of US, Italy and France have risen drastically, however, Russia’s and Spain’s have not -
Digital Music Revenues
Country
2010
2011
Increase/decrease
US
$190 million (2004)
$3.5 billion

France
215 million
275 million
27% increase
Italy
42 million
49 million
16% increase
Spain
44
44
0
Russia
73 million
43 million
41% decrease

In the UK, digital music revenues have recently surpassed physical media revenues and UK song writers are earning more from digital royalties (increase of 3.2% in 2011).[9]Digital music sales are also fast growing in Germany, up over 21% in 2011.[10]
The decline in revenues in Russia has been attributed to various suspected factors like piracy and file sharing, decline in ringtone royalties with the emergence of smart phones and the scarcity of legal digital music services.[11]However, there is no evidence of a decrease in demand for music and some attribute this decline to be part of a temporary business cycle phenomenon.[12]Though similar factors could have affected and lead to a decline in Indian digital music sales, numbers show that Indian digital music sales have actually increased. 

As reported, according to the FICCI-KPMG Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Report, 2012, sales of physical music of the Indian music industry decreased by 19 per % year-on-year but this was compensated by a significant increase of 24 % year-on-year sales in digital music. It was also noted that “interestingly 90 per cent of the total digital music sales have come from the mobile segment”. This could be attributed to the scarcity of internet music services in India. With the emergence of more such platforms, Indians believe that they will be able to explore new genres of music and increase demand for non-film genres (here). The FICCI-KPMG report also estimated that the Indian music industry would grow at CARG 17% to Rs. 18.66 billion by 2015, with digital music acting as the key growth driver.

With regard to digital music sales through mobile phones, areport stated that Kolaveri Di made it to Airtel’s 2011 top-sellers as it was downloaded 210,000 times within 18 months of launch. This report also stated that a survey among 170 million mobile customers of Airtel revealed 150 million music mobile music downloads last year. These are statistics of just one telecom player in India!
Moreover, another report in 2011, recorded that the ratio between digital music sales and physical sales is now around 70:30 and is heading towards 80:20. However, this report also states that since audio launches through CD’s help procedures publicize their films and that some users value tangible ownership of CD (though this is fast changing), physical copies continue to be preferred by regional music industries. 



[1] Michael Masnick Michael Ho, The Sky is Rising (Regional Study), CCIA Floor 64.
[2] Id., at p. 2 (Music production)
[3] Id. at p. 4.
[4] Id.
[5] Id.
[6] Id.
[7]Id., at p. 5 (Music revenues).
[8] Id. at p. 6.
[9]Id.
[10] Id.
[11] Id.
[12] Id.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Copyright, Technology | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • IPAB on Payyannur Ring
    [*S lightly long post] Background: The Intellectual Property Appellate Board (“ IPAB ”), in its recent order in SubhashJewellery v. Payyan...
  • Guest Post: Intermediary liability in defamation cases - Parle, Mouthshut & Visakha cases to clarify the law
    Chaitanya Ramachandran, who has blogged for us previously over here and here , has sent us this excellent guest post analyzing the extent of...
  • IP Research Assistant position at IIT, Madras
    Feroz Ali Khader, MHRD IP Chair at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras, is looking for research assistants to work on various is...
  • Dorling Kindersley v. Sanguine Technical Publishers
    A recent Delhi High Court order passed on 21 January, 2013  with respect to copyright licensing has come to our notice. An analysis of the j...
  • Call for Papers: IIT Bombay and MHRD jointly announce the 2nd International Conference on Management of Intellectual Property and Strategy
    The readers may be interested to know that the Shailesh J. Mehta School of Management of IIT Bombay is geared up to host, in collaboration w...
  • SpicyIP Tidbit: ALCS August Distribution
    In the UK, the Authors' Licensing and Collecting Society is an organization run and owned by writers that collects money due to its mem...
  • Delhi HC rejects the "Hot News" Doctrine: A Summary
    The applicability of the Hot News doctrine was rejected recently in a landmark ruling delivered by Justice Bhat of the Delhi HC. This post i...
  • Satyajit Ray's sketches and copyright controversies
    A copyright row appears to have started between the Satyajit Ray Society and the Delhi Art Gallery, that is organising a countrywide exhibit...
  • Thalappakatti biryani trademark row
    The southern district of Dindigal in Tamil Nadu occupies a special place in the hearts of biryani lovers. In the late 1950s, one Nagasamy N...
  • Karnataka High Court temporarily restrains German company from exploiting trade secrets of Homag India
    Image from here In an interesting judgment dated 10th October, 2012 the Karnataka High Court, sitting at Bangalore, has passed an interim in...

Categories

  • 126 (1)
  • 3(d) (4)
  • 3(f) (1)
  • 3(i) (1)
  • 3(k) (2)
  • Academic Writing (1)
  • access (10)
  • access to food (1)
  • access to health (3)
  • AIA (1)
  • AIDS/HIV (3)
  • Antitrust (2)
  • Bajaj v LML (1)
  • Basmati Row (2)
  • Biological Diversity (5)
  • Biologics (2)
  • biopiracy (4)
  • biotech (7)
  • Bollywood (25)
  • Broadcasters Rights (5)
  • Budget (1)
  • business method patent (2)
  • Call for papers (2)
  • Cipla (2)
  • Comparative Advertising (4)
  • Competition law (8)
  • Compulsory Licensing (27)
  • condonation of delay (1)
  • Conference (4)
  • Constitution (12)
  • Contracts (1)
  • Controller's decisions (8)
  • Copyright (112)
  • Copyright Amendment Bill 2010 (23)
  • copyright board (4)
  • Copyright Exceptions (6)
  • copyright office (1)
  • Copyright Rules (2013) (5)
  • Copyright Societies (9)
  • Counterfeiting (1)
  • creativity (1)
  • Cross Retaliation (1)
  • csir (4)
  • d (1)
  • D.U. Photocopy Case (16)
  • Darjeeling Tea (3)
  • Data Exclusivity (2)
  • Database (1)
  • DCGI (2)
  • decompilation (2)
  • defamation (9)
  • Designs (3)
  • Designs Act (3)
  • Differential Pricing (2)
  • Dilution (1)
  • Disabilities (3)
  • Disability (2)
  • DMCA (2)
  • Doha Declaration (1)
  • Domain Names (2)
  • Draft Policy of the Indian Government (2)
  • DRM (1)
  • Drug Regulation (7)
  • education (12)
  • Enercon (1)
  • Enforcement (1)
  • EU (2)
  • ex parte (2)
  • exhaustion (3)
  • Exhaustion of Rights (2)
  • Fair Dealing (8)
  • Fair Use (11)
  • Federal Circuit (1)
  • Fees (3)
  • FICCI (7)
  • FRAND (2)
  • free trade agreement (3)
  • FTA (3)
  • G.I. Registry (4)
  • gene sequences (3)
  • Generic medicine (4)
  • Geographical Indication (14)
  • Gilead (1)
  • Glenmark (5)
  • Gopika (34)
  • Guest post (11)
  • guidelines (1)
  • GWU-CII (1)
  • Herceptin (1)
  • hot news (3)
  • ICANN (1)
  • incremental innovation (1)
  • independence (1)
  • india (5)
  • Indian Government (1)
  • Indian patent litigation (27)
  • Indian Pharma (35)
  • Injunction (10)
  • Innovation (7)
  • INTA (1)
  • Intermediaries (10)
  • internet (11)
  • Internet Access Providers (IAPs) (5)
  • Internet Censorship (7)
  • IP scholarship (3)
  • IP aware (4)
  • IP Course (3)
  • IP Education (1)
  • IP Policy (11)
  • IP update (4)
  • ip writing competition (1)
  • IPAB (34)
  • ipchair (1)
  • IPO (1)
  • IPRS (5)
  • IT Act (1)
  • Journal (2)
  • judicial independence (3)
  • Jurisdiction (1)
  • Kruttika (4)
  • Legal Education (3)
  • Legal Research Tools (1)
  • Legal Scholarship (2)
  • library (2)
  • Licensing (7)
  • Madhulika (20)
  • mathematical methods (1)
  • Media law (3)
  • medical method (1)
  • Merck (4)
  • mhrd ip chair (1)
  • Microsoft (3)
  • Middle Path (1)
  • Moral Rights (2)
  • Movies (18)
  • musical work (2)
  • nanotechnology (1)
  • Natco (3)
  • natco defamation suit (5)
  • natco vs bayer (4)
  • need for transparency (1)
  • Novartis (8)
  • Novartis patent case in India (11)
  • NPEs (2)
  • nujs (1)
  • NUJS Conference (2)
  • Obituary (1)
  • obviousness (7)
  • Off-Topic (2)
  • online course (4)
  • Open Access (6)
  • Open Source (2)
  • Opposition (3)
  • Parallel Imports (4)
  • Parliament (1)
  • passing off (5)
  • Patent (52)
  • Patent act (10)
  • patent agent (5)
  • patent agent exam (9)
  • patent agent exam qualifications (3)
  • patent infringement (5)
  • Patent Licensing (2)
  • Patent litigation (2)
  • Patent Office (19)
  • patent pool (3)
  • Patent Prosecution (7)
  • Patent rules (2)
  • Patent Strategies (8)
  • Patents (9)
  • pegasus (1)
  • Personality Rights (1)
  • Pfizer (1)
  • Pharma (18)
  • Piracy (5)
  • plagiarism (3)
  • Plant Variety Protection (2)
  • post grant (1)
  • Prashant (2)
  • Preventive Detention (1)
  • Price Control (6)
  • prior publication (1)
  • Privacy (3)
  • Prizes (1)
  • public health (3)
  • Public Interest (4)
  • Publicity Rights (4)
  • Publishing (3)
  • radio (2)
  • Rajiv (18)
  • Rectification Petition (2)
  • Rejection (1)
  • research (3)
  • reverse engineering (2)
  • revocation (4)
  • rip (1)
  • Roche (2)
  • Roche vs Cipla (1)
  • Royalty (2)
  • RTI (2)
  • Scholarship (4)
  • section 16 (1)
  • Section 3(d) (7)
  • section 8 (6)
  • shamnad (11)
  • Shan Kohli (4)
  • Shouvik Kumar Guha (30)
  • Smartphones/Tablets (2)
  • Social Innovation (1)
  • Software (10)
  • software enforcement (3)
  • software patent (3)
  • Special 301 Report (1)
  • Spicy Tidbits (6)
  • spicyip (1)
  • SpicyIP Accolades (1)
  • SpicyIP Announcements (9)
  • SpicyIP Case (1)
  • SpicyIP Cases (3)
  • spicyip commiseration (1)
  • SpicyIP Events (11)
  • SpicyIP Fellowship (5)
  • SpicyIP Guest Series (22)
  • SpicyIP Interview (2)
  • SpicyIP Jobs (4)
  • SpicyIP Jobs/General (2)
  • SpicyIP Review (1)
  • SpicyIP Tidbits (11)
  • SpicyIP Weekly Review (27)
  • Statutory Licensing (1)
  • STI Policy 2013 (4)
  • Sugen (3)
  • Supreme Court of India (5)
  • Swaraj (19)
  • Tarnishment (1)
  • Technology (6)
  • Technology Transfer (5)
  • TKDL (5)
  • TPP (1)
  • trade (4)
  • Trade Secret Protection (1)
  • Trademark (59)
  • Trademark dilution (1)
  • Trademark Registry (9)
  • Traditional Knowledge (7)
  • Transparency (5)
  • treaty (1)
  • trial (1)
  • tribunals (2)
  • TRIPS (11)
  • UK (3)
  • unfair competition (5)
  • UNFCCC (1)
  • Universities Research and Innovation Bill (2)
  • US (1)
  • US Patent Reform (1)
  • US Supreme Court (3)
  • viva (3)
  • WIPO (5)
  • Working a Patent (2)
  • Workshop (4)
  • writ (1)
  • WTO (1)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (364)
    • ►  September (13)
    • ►  August (41)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (36)
    • ►  May (32)
    • ►  April (51)
    • ►  March (66)
    • ▼  February (40)
      • Off-Topic: Call for Papers from the Journal of Tel...
      • Budget 2013-14: What’s in stock for IP and innovat...
      • LDCs seek indefinite extension of transition perio...
      • Madras High Court judgment gives a boost to unauth...
      • SpicyIP Event: MIP India IP and Innovation Forum
      • National Innovation Foundation: Boosting Frugal Te...
      • SpicyIP Weekly Review (February Week 4)
      • SpicyIP Tidbit: Retraction Watch posts restored
      • Revisiting the Trans Pacific partnership agreement
      • The Sugen v. Cipla post-grant opposition: The lost...
      • Legality of trademark protection for deities in th...
      • Guest Post: The complex problem of developing mode...
      • SpicyIP Weekly Review- ( February Week 3)
      • Blocking (Counting) your Chickens before they hatc...
      • Accessibility of public libraries to persons with ...
      • The ‘Global’ Fund being criticized
      • Spicy IP Tidbit: Indian patent office puts an end ...
      • The G.I. Registry digitizes all G.I. records: Tran...
      • Dorling Kindersley v. Sanguine Technical Publishers
      • BMS Hepatitis Patent Invalidated: A Viral Effect f...
      • Patent prosecution highway: A potential game chang...
      • SpicyIP Event: Pharma IPR 2013
      • Patent Office finally takes Form 27s seriously
      • SpicyIP Weekly Review- (February Week 2)
      • Why aren’t there any takers for compulsory licenses?
      • The 19 year war- Financial Times Ltd. v Times Publ...
      • RetractionWatch fiasco: Manipulation of DMCA notic...
      • IPAB directs IPO to accept national phase patent a...
      • SpicyIP Events: MIP's 2nd Annual India IP and Inno...
      • New Unitary Patent System For Europe
      • Is there a need to break up the cartels in the rad...
      • Jailbreaking Sony Playstations To Be Illegal in In...
      • Is the suit again the Registrar of Copyright maint...
      • Déjà vu for Akhtar – nightmare before Barasat Cour...
      • Faking it! Indian Companies using IKEA’s trademarks
      • Latest In: Delhi HC bars Bisleri from using brand ...
      • Part II: Digitization- Growth trends of the Film a...
      • Part I: Digitization of content: a comparative ana...
      • Patent office notifies the next patent agent exami...
      • IPAB revokes several claims of yet another patent ...
    • ►  January (49)
  • ►  2012 (131)
    • ►  December (29)
    • ►  November (42)
    • ►  October (50)
    • ►  September (10)
Powered by Blogger.