SupremeCourt

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, October 21, 2012

September 2012: Controller's decisions at the IPO

Posted on 2:23 AM by Unknown

In the month of September, 2012 the Controller's offices issued 94 decisions.  Out of these 94, 46 decisions were granted, 33 refused (including abandoned and withdrawn) and no file uploaded for the remainder (15). There is one instance of a typographical error: perhaps unintentional - where the Controller allowed the application but numbered it incorrectly.  The case is for application 762/MUMNP/2008, and the  Controller allowed the application for 787/MUM/2008.
Some interesting decisions: The decisions for section 3(k) / 3(d) / 3(e) make for an extremely interesting read!  The decision for a divisional filing is also interesting because this is one of the few instances where the Patent Office has allowed an applicant to split the application.


APPLICATION NUMBER
APPLICANT
Decision / Issue
CONTROLLER
11/CHENP/2007
NOVAMONT S.P.A.
Refused; 2(1)(j)
Anoop K Joy
97/CHE/2005
MASCHINENFABRIK RIETER AG
Granted
Anoop K Joy
3586/CHENP/2006
AISAPACK HOLDING S.A
Granted
Anoop K Joy
2428/CHENP/2006
DURECT CORPORATION
Granted
Anoop K Joy
909/DELNP/2008
PURANOX MEDICAL B.V.
Refused
Ashok Kumar
2474/DEL/2006
CSIR
Refused; 2(1)(j)
Ashok Kumar
2158/DELNP/2008
UOP LLC
Granted
Ashok Kumar
531/CHE/2003
ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES GMBH
Refused ; 3(k)
C Naveen Andrew
3009/CHENP/2006
BODYBIO INC
Refused
C Naveen Andrew
100/MUM/2008
DILIP R. SABLE
Refused
Dr. Amarendra Samal
244/MUM/2006
CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED
Refused
Dr. Amarendra Samal
1763/MUM/2008
BHARAT PETROLEUM
Refused
Dr. Amarendra Samal
42/MUMNP/2009
UNILEVER PLC
Granted
Dr. Amarendra Samal
1568/MUM/2008
IIT, BOMBAY
Granted
Dr. Amarendra Samal
1200/MUM/2004
DISHMAN PHARMA
Granted
Dr. Amarendra Samal
928/MUMNP/2007
TEXACO DEV.CORP.
Granted
Dr. Amarendra Samal
2780/MUMNP/2008
CORIXA CORPORATION
Refused
Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
2632/MUMNP/2008
PEPTRON CO.,  LTD.
Granted
Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
1433/MUMNP/2009
FRITO-LAY NORTH AMERICA  INC.
Granted
Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
1529/MUM/2008
ABELLON BIOENERGY
Refused
Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
2268/MUMNP/2008
PANASONIC CORPORATION
Granted
Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
1740/MUMNP/2009
PEPTRON CO., LTD
Granted
Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
11/MUMNP/2010
HANMI PHARMACEUTICAL CO.  LTD.
Granted
Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
87/MUMNP/2010
MIKROBIOLOGICKY USTAV AV CR V.V.I.
Granted
Dr. Dinesh P. Patil
2662/DEL/2006
G.B. PANT
Granted
Dr.Rajesh Dixit
1132/DEL/2005
ICAR
Refused; 3(d); 2(1)(j)
Dr.Rajesh Dixit
4703/DELNP/2007
PPG INDUSTRIES OHIO INC.
Refused; 2(1)(j); 3(e )
Dr.Rajesh Dixit
2852/DELNP/2006
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.,
Granted
Dr.Rajesh Dixit
1133/DELNP/2006
UCB S.A.
No file uploaded
Dr.S.S.Singh
3470/DELNP/2006
PRONOVA BIOPHARMA NORGE AS
No file uploaded
Dr.S.S.Singh
1099/DELNP/2007
LIPOXEN TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
No file uploaded
Dr.S.S.Singh
3488/CHENP/2006
SHIN-ETSU CHEMICAL CO., LTD
Refused; 3(d); 2(1)(ja)
K S Hariram
1020/CHENP/2008
F. HOFFAMANN-LA ROCHE AG
Granted
K S Hariram
1144/CHENP/2008
MERCK SERONO SA
Refused; 2(1)(ja); 3( e)
K S Hariram
2315/DEL/2007
ICAR
Refused; 3(d); 3(j); 3(i)
Monika Yadav
2835/DEL/2006
DEPARTMENT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY (DBT)
Refused; 3(d); 2(1)(ja)
Monika Yadav
3534/DELNP/2004
CHIESI FARMACEUTICI S.P.A
No file uploaded
Monika Yadav
7306/DELNP/2006
PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Refused
Monika Yadav
5568/DELNP/2005
MERCIA PHARMA, INC.
Refused
Monika Yadav
2757/DELNP/2004
CSIR
Refused
Monika Yadav
3929/DELNP/2007
THOMAS SCHMULLING
Refused
Monika Yadav
3664/DELNP/2006
NA
No file uploaded
Monika Yadav
3346/DELNP/2007
DHHS
No file uploaded
Monika Yadav
449/DEL/2005
FALMER INVESTMENTS LTD
Granted
Mr. Naveen Mathur
3399/CHENP/2007
LONZA AG
Granted
Ms. P. Rajanbabu
880/MUM/2004
SINGH, KAMALINDER KAUR
Granted
N. Ramchander
762/MUMNP/2008
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED
Granted * 787/MUM/2008
N. Ramchander
787/MUM/2008
PRS SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
Granted
N. Ramchander
385/MUMNP/2006
Cipla
Refused
N. Ramchander
1136/MUM/2008
CLARIS LIFESCIENCES LIMITED
Granted
N. Ramchander
1607/MUMNP/2007
INKTEC CO. LTD.
Granted
N. Ramchander
2352/MUM/2008
IDEAL CURES PRIVATE LIMITED
Granted
N. Ramchander
152/MUMNP/2007
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED
No file uploaded
N. Ramchander
615/MUMNP/2008
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Granted
N.K.MOHANTY
2029/MUMNP/2007
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Granted
N.K.MOHANTY
925/MUMNP/2006
TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET. L.M. ERICSSON
Granted
N.K.MOHANTY
1194/MUMNP/2007
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Granted
N.K.MOHANTY
290/KOLNP/2007
M2ANY GMBH
Granted
Nirmalya Sinha
3704/KOLNP/2006
SONNETICA LTD.
Granted
Nirmalya Sinha
138/KOLNP/2007
DIALOGIC NETWORKS (ISRAEL) LTD.,
Granted
Nirmalya Sinha
2154/DELNP/2005
MARTIN COUSINEAU
Refused
P S Rao
49/DEL/2005
BAO-SHEN LIU,CHANG-YUN YONG
Refused
P S Rao
7909/DELNP/2006
LUTRON ELECTRONICS CO., INC
Refused
P S Rao
2035/DELNP/2006
RIETER PERFOJET
Refused
P S Rao
5018/DELNP/2006
SANLE(HONGKONG) INTERNATIONAL
Refused
P.S RAO
1452/MUM/2005
HINDUSTAN LEVER UNILIMITED
Granted
Pankaj Borkar
2167/MUM/2007
TATA MOTORS LIMITED
Granted
Pankaj Borkar
869/MUM/2005
NARENDRA SUDHAKAR SHINDE
Granted
Pankaj Borkar
2238/MUMNP/2007
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Refused
Pinkesh Jain
2491/MUM/2007
VIA TELECOM CO. LTD.
Granted
Pinkesh Jain
938/KOL/2005
SECO TOOLS AB
Granted
Santanu Dey
1814/KOLNP/2006
EATON CORPORATION
Granted
Santanu Dey
2167/DELNP/2003
ASK S.A.
No file uploaded
Sh.S.N.Sav
2734/DELNP/2004
EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH
No file uploaded
Sh.S.N.Sav
560/DELNP/2004
THOMSON LICENSING S.A.
No file uploaded
Sh.S.N.Sav
1273/DEL/2005
RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED
No file uploaded
Sh.S.N.Sav
7536/DELNP/2006
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,
No file uploaded
Sh.S.N.Sav
6242/DELNP/2006
MOTOROLA, INC
No file uploaded
Sh.S.N.Sav
7191/DELNP/2006
NOKIA CORPORATION
No file uploaded
Sh.S.N.Sav
2353/DEL/2005
CIBA SPECIALTY INC.
Granted *Divisional Filing*
Shah Alam
1624/DEL/2005
CORNING INCORPORATED
No file uploaded
Shah Alam
687/DELNP/2006
TIBOTEC PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
Refused; 2(1); 3(d); 3(e )
Shah Alam
2018/KOLNP/2007
WYETH
Refused
Soumen Ghosh
442/CHENP/2006
TRIDENT MICRO (FAR EAST) LTD.
Granted
V Saravanan
3483/CHENP/2007
OPTIMEDICA CORPORATION
Refused 2(1)(j)
V Saravanan
1306/CHENP/2007
AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS
Granted
V Saravanan
796/MUM/2007
ACCOTEX-TEXPARTS GMBH
Refused
Vikash Sharma
1641/MUMNP/2007
JIANG HONG
Refused
Vikash Sharma
1528/MUM/2007
STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Granted
Vikash Sharma
803/MUM/2001
HONDA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Granted
Vikash Sharma
1103/MUM/2007
RIETER INGOLSTADT GMBH
Granted
Vikash Sharma
1265/MUMNP/2007
ABERTAX R&D LTD.
Granted
Vikash Sharma
585/MUM/2007
TATA MOTORS LIMITED
Granted
Vikash Sharma
1779/DELNP/2006
THE LARYNGEAL MASK CO.
Refused
Vinod Kumar
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Controller's decisions, patent agent exam, Patent Prosecution, Patent Strategies, Rajiv | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • IPAB on Payyannur Ring
    [*S lightly long post] Background: The Intellectual Property Appellate Board (“ IPAB ”), in its recent order in SubhashJewellery v. Payyan...
  • Guest Post: Intermediary liability in defamation cases - Parle, Mouthshut & Visakha cases to clarify the law
    Chaitanya Ramachandran, who has blogged for us previously over here and here , has sent us this excellent guest post analyzing the extent of...
  • IP Research Assistant position at IIT, Madras
    Feroz Ali Khader, MHRD IP Chair at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras, is looking for research assistants to work on various is...
  • Dorling Kindersley v. Sanguine Technical Publishers
    A recent Delhi High Court order passed on 21 January, 2013  with respect to copyright licensing has come to our notice. An analysis of the j...
  • Call for Papers: IIT Bombay and MHRD jointly announce the 2nd International Conference on Management of Intellectual Property and Strategy
    The readers may be interested to know that the Shailesh J. Mehta School of Management of IIT Bombay is geared up to host, in collaboration w...
  • SpicyIP Tidbit: ALCS August Distribution
    In the UK, the Authors' Licensing and Collecting Society is an organization run and owned by writers that collects money due to its mem...
  • Delhi HC rejects the "Hot News" Doctrine: A Summary
    The applicability of the Hot News doctrine was rejected recently in a landmark ruling delivered by Justice Bhat of the Delhi HC. This post i...
  • Satyajit Ray's sketches and copyright controversies
    A copyright row appears to have started between the Satyajit Ray Society and the Delhi Art Gallery, that is organising a countrywide exhibit...
  • Thalappakatti biryani trademark row
    The southern district of Dindigal in Tamil Nadu occupies a special place in the hearts of biryani lovers. In the late 1950s, one Nagasamy N...
  • Karnataka High Court temporarily restrains German company from exploiting trade secrets of Homag India
    Image from here In an interesting judgment dated 10th October, 2012 the Karnataka High Court, sitting at Bangalore, has passed an interim in...

Categories

  • 126 (1)
  • 3(d) (4)
  • 3(f) (1)
  • 3(i) (1)
  • 3(k) (2)
  • Academic Writing (1)
  • access (10)
  • access to food (1)
  • access to health (3)
  • AIA (1)
  • AIDS/HIV (3)
  • Antitrust (2)
  • Bajaj v LML (1)
  • Basmati Row (2)
  • Biological Diversity (5)
  • Biologics (2)
  • biopiracy (4)
  • biotech (7)
  • Bollywood (25)
  • Broadcasters Rights (5)
  • Budget (1)
  • business method patent (2)
  • Call for papers (2)
  • Cipla (2)
  • Comparative Advertising (4)
  • Competition law (8)
  • Compulsory Licensing (27)
  • condonation of delay (1)
  • Conference (4)
  • Constitution (12)
  • Contracts (1)
  • Controller's decisions (8)
  • Copyright (112)
  • Copyright Amendment Bill 2010 (23)
  • copyright board (4)
  • Copyright Exceptions (6)
  • copyright office (1)
  • Copyright Rules (2013) (5)
  • Copyright Societies (9)
  • Counterfeiting (1)
  • creativity (1)
  • Cross Retaliation (1)
  • csir (4)
  • d (1)
  • D.U. Photocopy Case (16)
  • Darjeeling Tea (3)
  • Data Exclusivity (2)
  • Database (1)
  • DCGI (2)
  • decompilation (2)
  • defamation (9)
  • Designs (3)
  • Designs Act (3)
  • Differential Pricing (2)
  • Dilution (1)
  • Disabilities (3)
  • Disability (2)
  • DMCA (2)
  • Doha Declaration (1)
  • Domain Names (2)
  • Draft Policy of the Indian Government (2)
  • DRM (1)
  • Drug Regulation (7)
  • education (12)
  • Enercon (1)
  • Enforcement (1)
  • EU (2)
  • ex parte (2)
  • exhaustion (3)
  • Exhaustion of Rights (2)
  • Fair Dealing (8)
  • Fair Use (11)
  • Federal Circuit (1)
  • Fees (3)
  • FICCI (7)
  • FRAND (2)
  • free trade agreement (3)
  • FTA (3)
  • G.I. Registry (4)
  • gene sequences (3)
  • Generic medicine (4)
  • Geographical Indication (14)
  • Gilead (1)
  • Glenmark (5)
  • Gopika (34)
  • Guest post (11)
  • guidelines (1)
  • GWU-CII (1)
  • Herceptin (1)
  • hot news (3)
  • ICANN (1)
  • incremental innovation (1)
  • independence (1)
  • india (5)
  • Indian Government (1)
  • Indian patent litigation (27)
  • Indian Pharma (35)
  • Injunction (10)
  • Innovation (7)
  • INTA (1)
  • Intermediaries (10)
  • internet (11)
  • Internet Access Providers (IAPs) (5)
  • Internet Censorship (7)
  • IP scholarship (3)
  • IP aware (4)
  • IP Course (3)
  • IP Education (1)
  • IP Policy (11)
  • IP update (4)
  • ip writing competition (1)
  • IPAB (34)
  • ipchair (1)
  • IPO (1)
  • IPRS (5)
  • IT Act (1)
  • Journal (2)
  • judicial independence (3)
  • Jurisdiction (1)
  • Kruttika (4)
  • Legal Education (3)
  • Legal Research Tools (1)
  • Legal Scholarship (2)
  • library (2)
  • Licensing (7)
  • Madhulika (20)
  • mathematical methods (1)
  • Media law (3)
  • medical method (1)
  • Merck (4)
  • mhrd ip chair (1)
  • Microsoft (3)
  • Middle Path (1)
  • Moral Rights (2)
  • Movies (18)
  • musical work (2)
  • nanotechnology (1)
  • Natco (3)
  • natco defamation suit (5)
  • natco vs bayer (4)
  • need for transparency (1)
  • Novartis (8)
  • Novartis patent case in India (11)
  • NPEs (2)
  • nujs (1)
  • NUJS Conference (2)
  • Obituary (1)
  • obviousness (7)
  • Off-Topic (2)
  • online course (4)
  • Open Access (6)
  • Open Source (2)
  • Opposition (3)
  • Parallel Imports (4)
  • Parliament (1)
  • passing off (5)
  • Patent (52)
  • Patent act (10)
  • patent agent (5)
  • patent agent exam (9)
  • patent agent exam qualifications (3)
  • patent infringement (5)
  • Patent Licensing (2)
  • Patent litigation (2)
  • Patent Office (19)
  • patent pool (3)
  • Patent Prosecution (7)
  • Patent rules (2)
  • Patent Strategies (8)
  • Patents (9)
  • pegasus (1)
  • Personality Rights (1)
  • Pfizer (1)
  • Pharma (18)
  • Piracy (5)
  • plagiarism (3)
  • Plant Variety Protection (2)
  • post grant (1)
  • Prashant (2)
  • Preventive Detention (1)
  • Price Control (6)
  • prior publication (1)
  • Privacy (3)
  • Prizes (1)
  • public health (3)
  • Public Interest (4)
  • Publicity Rights (4)
  • Publishing (3)
  • radio (2)
  • Rajiv (18)
  • Rectification Petition (2)
  • Rejection (1)
  • research (3)
  • reverse engineering (2)
  • revocation (4)
  • rip (1)
  • Roche (2)
  • Roche vs Cipla (1)
  • Royalty (2)
  • RTI (2)
  • Scholarship (4)
  • section 16 (1)
  • Section 3(d) (7)
  • section 8 (6)
  • shamnad (11)
  • Shan Kohli (4)
  • Shouvik Kumar Guha (30)
  • Smartphones/Tablets (2)
  • Social Innovation (1)
  • Software (10)
  • software enforcement (3)
  • software patent (3)
  • Special 301 Report (1)
  • Spicy Tidbits (6)
  • spicyip (1)
  • SpicyIP Accolades (1)
  • SpicyIP Announcements (9)
  • SpicyIP Case (1)
  • SpicyIP Cases (3)
  • spicyip commiseration (1)
  • SpicyIP Events (11)
  • SpicyIP Fellowship (5)
  • SpicyIP Guest Series (22)
  • SpicyIP Interview (2)
  • SpicyIP Jobs (4)
  • SpicyIP Jobs/General (2)
  • SpicyIP Review (1)
  • SpicyIP Tidbits (11)
  • SpicyIP Weekly Review (27)
  • Statutory Licensing (1)
  • STI Policy 2013 (4)
  • Sugen (3)
  • Supreme Court of India (5)
  • Swaraj (19)
  • Tarnishment (1)
  • Technology (6)
  • Technology Transfer (5)
  • TKDL (5)
  • TPP (1)
  • trade (4)
  • Trade Secret Protection (1)
  • Trademark (59)
  • Trademark dilution (1)
  • Trademark Registry (9)
  • Traditional Knowledge (7)
  • Transparency (5)
  • treaty (1)
  • trial (1)
  • tribunals (2)
  • TRIPS (11)
  • UK (3)
  • unfair competition (5)
  • UNFCCC (1)
  • Universities Research and Innovation Bill (2)
  • US (1)
  • US Patent Reform (1)
  • US Supreme Court (3)
  • viva (3)
  • WIPO (5)
  • Working a Patent (2)
  • Workshop (4)
  • writ (1)
  • WTO (1)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (364)
    • ►  September (13)
    • ►  August (41)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (36)
    • ►  May (32)
    • ►  April (51)
    • ►  March (66)
    • ►  February (40)
    • ►  January (49)
  • ▼  2012 (131)
    • ►  December (29)
    • ►  November (42)
    • ▼  October (50)
      • 5 Reasons Why Course Packs are Legal in India
      • Academia struggles to pay up as Journal prices soar!
      • First sale doctrine under threat in US
      • Guest Post: Ownership and Assignment of Indian Pat...
      • Supreme Court grants BharatMatrimony stay against ...
      • IP in the multiverse: Law of Superheroes
      • Govt. of India follows up on SpicyIP reporting – r...
      • Karnataka High Court temporarily restrains German ...
      • Copyright Aggression vs Educational Access: The "G...
      • Rebutting arguments against multiple copyright soc...
      • Mapping out the future of Indian copyright societies
      • Add a disclaimer says Supreme Court: Bata has happ...
      • Spicy IP Weekly Review (October Week 3)
      • Delhi University Restrained for Alleged Admission ...
      • Appeal to Publishers to Withdraw Suit Filed agains...
      • September 2012: Controller's decisions at the IPO
      • The ‘Register of Owners’ for future copyright soci...
      • Bata sho(o)ed out of Court - No defamation says De...
      • Sugen’s desperate attempt to save its Sunitinib pa...
      • Internet Fraud: Bogus Open Access Journals
      • Guest Post: Bayer-Natco decision TRIPS Compliant?
      • Guest Post: ‘Xerox’ is not Generic.......Yet?!
      • Spicy IP Weekly Review (October Week 2)
      • Roche vs Cipla: A Patent Disappointment?
      • Ever participated in a clinical trial? Perhaps.
      • An anonymous comment in response to the DU Campaig...
      • A test case for India’s new safe harbour provision...
      • Karnataka High Court quashes Controller General’s ...
      • The perils of selective journalism
      • Defensive Patent Licensing: A way out of the Paten...
      • Delhi High Court seeks to break the Myth of 'Break...
      • DU Photocopy Case: Who's Afraid of Copyright?
      • Guest Post: Exide v. Exide: Too much Exidement?
      • Guest Post: The New India Guidelines on Similar Bi...
      • Intellectual Property Rights: Infringement and Rem...
      • More controversy during appointments to IPAB: Delh...
      • SpicyIP Weekly Review (October Week 1)
      • SC on the new drug policy
      • India signs Nagoya protocol ahead of Hyderabad CBD...
      • WIPO defers PPI observer status
      • The need for iron-clad enforcement of Section 8 di...
      • NBA set to prosecute Monsanto’s Indian subsidiary:...
      • Breaking News: Delhi High Court recognizes interna...
      • Breaking news: Cipla succeeds in revoking Pfizer /...
      • TKDL poised to draw first blood before Indian pate...
      • ICANN set to change the topography of the internet
      • Call for Papers: Christ University, Law Journal
      • A Glass and a Half full of Purple Joy: Cadbury win...
      • EBC granted injunction against Lexis Nexis for inf...
      • Novelty of Design: Tarun Sethi v. Vikas Budhiraja
    • ►  September (10)
Powered by Blogger.