SupremeCourt

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, September 30, 2012

SpicyIP Weekly Review (September Week 4)

Posted on 7:56 AM by Unknown

A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court earlier this month made critical remarks on the government’s failure to finalize the drug policy pending since 2003, calling it a ‘slur on the face of all stake-holders’. Following this, the Group of Ministers held meetings to consider a retail pricing mechanism for essential drugs. It was agreed that the prices of 348 drugs set out in the National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM) will be covered under the policy. The drug policy is vital for addressing accessibility and affordability concerns at all levels of healthcare in India. Mathews, in his post, rightly pointed out observations made by the IPAB in denying the stay order to Bayer Corp over the compulsory license wherein the Bench stated that ‘right of access of medicines is as  much as a matter of right to dignity of the patients’.


Shouvik reported three unrelated but connected events which promise to give a major boost to access to knowledge in India. First up is Prof. Anil Gupta’s brainchild Techpedia, an open source virtual platform for professionals and students of technical fields to disseminate, edit and improve their works in addition to seeking assistance on solving problems. As Shouvik puts it, Techpedia is undoubtedly Wikipedia’s technical counterpart. Recently, Techpedia received applause from NIT engineers during a conclave in Nagpur. Next up is Knimbus, a first-of-its-kind initiative which fuses social networking features to facilitate access to scientific content, sharing and networking with peers on a real time basis. Since its inception only a year ago, , Knimbus has a user base of over 30,000 researchers and scientists. Lastly, the Centre for Internet & Society (CIS) received grants from the Wikimedia Foundation for its access to knowledge program in India. CIS will now collaborate with the Wikimedia community to expand the latters’ Indic language free knowledge projects.

The Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) announced a first-of-its-kind online certificate course on ‘IPR and Pharmaceutical R&D’ (CCIPR). The course aims to provide a platform to understand the working of the pharmaceutical industry, its business models, research, regulatory aspects and its relevance with respect to IPR. The course is open to students and professionals in the pharmaceutical industry. Registration closes on October 25, 2012. For more details please visit www.ficciipcourse.in or email at ipcourse@ficci.com.

International Developments

The European Trade Council and German Tea Association agreed to confer Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) status to Darjeeling tea, as reported by the Economic Times. This is in continuance with the earlier grant of G.I. status on Darjeeling tea by the European Union. Henceforth, blenders in Europe cannot sell any tea mixture as Darjeeling tea unless the content is purely originating from Darjeeling.

The Cypriot Presidency on September 27, 2012 published the latest draft of the Unified Patent Court agreement, reports the IPKat. The Central Division of the Court will be located in Paris, with London and Munich as other divisions. Among other issues, the draft clarifies that the Court shall have the same jurisdictions as national courts in relation to European patents. 

An actress who appeared in ‘Innocence of Muslims’, the film which wreaked havoc in the Middle East, filed another lawsuit to take down the 13 minute film trailer on YouTube. Cindy Lee Garcia, in a desperate attempt, filed the suit alleging copyright infringement on the part of Google Inc. and sought unspecified damages. The actress claimed copyright over the movie and accused the director of illegal distribution of the movie. Garcia earlier stated that she was duped into believing that the movie was ‘Desert Warriors’ and had no clue that the movie would have anything to do with the Prophet. In my opinion, there are little merits in the suit simply because copyrights usually vests with the producer of cinematographic film and actors acquire rights only upon express agreement.  

In a shocking development, Google disabled an author’s AdSense account for torrenting his own book for free and for providing torrent links on his blog. Cody Jackson published his book on programming language Python on CC license and torrented them on Pirate Bay and Demonoid. He received an auto generated message last week from Google accusing him of ‘hosting copyrighted files on your site, as well as providing links for or driving traffic to sites that contain copyrighted material’. Google rejected his request to restore his account when he tried to explain his situation forcing him to remove the links from his blog.  His AdSense account is, however, yet to be restored.

The neutrality stance of Google came under fire once again following the arrest of its president of operations in Brazil, following the delay in the removal of two videos on YouTube that allegedly slander, insult and defame a candidate in a Brazilian town. An electoral court had earlier held the crime in question to be one of disobedience. Google has repeatedly attempted to stress on its role as an ‘internet middleman’ with no liability over the content posted by its users. The suit presents a jurisdictional dilemma as the employees in the company’s US headquarters are being sued by local courts and authorities even outside the country. 

The African Union is soon to setup the Pan-African Intellectual Property Organization (PAIPO), a specialized agency at the inter-governmental level. PAIPO’s primary functions involve standard setting, harmonization of laws, policy formulation, promoting and development of IP in the Union. On the other hand, opposition to the Agreement is slowly gaining momentum and some even fear disastrous consequences on access to drugs and human right violations in Africa.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in SpicyIP Weekly Review | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • IPAB on Payyannur Ring
    [*S lightly long post] Background: The Intellectual Property Appellate Board (“ IPAB ”), in its recent order in SubhashJewellery v. Payyan...
  • Satyajit Ray's sketches and copyright controversies
    A copyright row appears to have started between the Satyajit Ray Society and the Delhi Art Gallery, that is organising a countrywide exhibit...
  • Ghost Post: Samsung v. Apple Presidential Enforcement Veto
    SpicyIP subscribers recently received a short blurb from Shamnad on this FT article regarding the hypocrisy of stamping 'national inter...
  • Dorling Kindersley v. Sanguine Technical Publishers
    A recent Delhi High Court order passed on 21 January, 2013  with respect to copyright licensing has come to our notice. An analysis of the j...
  • SpicyIP Tidbit: ALCS August Distribution
    In the UK, the Authors' Licensing and Collecting Society is an organization run and owned by writers that collects money due to its mem...
  • Delhi HC rejects the "Hot News" Doctrine: A Summary
    The applicability of the Hot News doctrine was rejected recently in a landmark ruling delivered by Justice Bhat of the Delhi HC. This post i...
  • IP Research Assistant position at IIT, Madras
    Feroz Ali Khader, MHRD IP Chair at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras, is looking for research assistants to work on various is...
  • Thalappakatti biryani trademark row
    The southern district of Dindigal in Tamil Nadu occupies a special place in the hearts of biryani lovers. In the late 1950s, one Nagasamy N...
  • SpicyIP Tidbit: GI for Pedana Kalamkari Art Form
    Image from here Recently, as The Hindu reports , Pedana Kalamkari art form received GI protection. Members of Vegetable Dye Hand Block Kalam...
  • Loss of an IP Leader: RIP Prof Daruwalla
    Most in the Indian IP firmament may have heard of the doleful demise of one of our IP leaders, Mr. Tehemtan Nasserwanji Daruwalla. He was an...

Categories

  • 126 (1)
  • 3(d) (4)
  • 3(f) (1)
  • 3(i) (1)
  • 3(k) (2)
  • Academic Writing (1)
  • access (10)
  • access to food (1)
  • access to health (3)
  • AIA (1)
  • AIDS/HIV (3)
  • Antitrust (2)
  • Bajaj v LML (1)
  • Basmati Row (2)
  • Biological Diversity (5)
  • Biologics (2)
  • biopiracy (4)
  • biotech (7)
  • Bollywood (25)
  • Broadcasters Rights (5)
  • Budget (1)
  • business method patent (2)
  • Call for papers (2)
  • Cipla (2)
  • Comparative Advertising (4)
  • Competition law (8)
  • Compulsory Licensing (27)
  • condonation of delay (1)
  • Conference (4)
  • Constitution (12)
  • Contracts (1)
  • Controller's decisions (8)
  • Copyright (112)
  • Copyright Amendment Bill 2010 (23)
  • copyright board (4)
  • Copyright Exceptions (6)
  • copyright office (1)
  • Copyright Rules (2013) (5)
  • Copyright Societies (9)
  • Counterfeiting (1)
  • creativity (1)
  • Cross Retaliation (1)
  • csir (4)
  • d (1)
  • D.U. Photocopy Case (16)
  • Darjeeling Tea (3)
  • Data Exclusivity (2)
  • Database (1)
  • DCGI (2)
  • decompilation (2)
  • defamation (9)
  • Designs (3)
  • Designs Act (3)
  • Differential Pricing (2)
  • Dilution (1)
  • Disabilities (3)
  • Disability (2)
  • DMCA (2)
  • Doha Declaration (1)
  • Domain Names (2)
  • Draft Policy of the Indian Government (2)
  • DRM (1)
  • Drug Regulation (7)
  • education (12)
  • Enercon (1)
  • Enforcement (1)
  • EU (2)
  • ex parte (2)
  • exhaustion (3)
  • Exhaustion of Rights (2)
  • Fair Dealing (8)
  • Fair Use (11)
  • Federal Circuit (1)
  • Fees (3)
  • FICCI (7)
  • FRAND (2)
  • free trade agreement (3)
  • FTA (3)
  • G.I. Registry (4)
  • gene sequences (3)
  • Generic medicine (4)
  • Geographical Indication (14)
  • Gilead (1)
  • Glenmark (5)
  • Gopika (34)
  • Guest post (11)
  • guidelines (1)
  • GWU-CII (1)
  • Herceptin (1)
  • hot news (3)
  • ICANN (1)
  • incremental innovation (1)
  • independence (1)
  • india (5)
  • Indian Government (1)
  • Indian patent litigation (27)
  • Indian Pharma (35)
  • Injunction (10)
  • Innovation (7)
  • INTA (1)
  • Intermediaries (10)
  • internet (11)
  • Internet Access Providers (IAPs) (5)
  • Internet Censorship (7)
  • IP scholarship (3)
  • IP aware (4)
  • IP Course (3)
  • IP Education (1)
  • IP Policy (11)
  • IP update (4)
  • ip writing competition (1)
  • IPAB (34)
  • ipchair (1)
  • IPO (1)
  • IPRS (5)
  • IT Act (1)
  • Journal (2)
  • judicial independence (3)
  • Jurisdiction (1)
  • Kruttika (4)
  • Legal Education (3)
  • Legal Research Tools (1)
  • Legal Scholarship (2)
  • library (2)
  • Licensing (7)
  • Madhulika (20)
  • mathematical methods (1)
  • Media law (3)
  • medical method (1)
  • Merck (4)
  • mhrd ip chair (1)
  • Microsoft (3)
  • Middle Path (1)
  • Moral Rights (2)
  • Movies (18)
  • musical work (2)
  • nanotechnology (1)
  • Natco (3)
  • natco defamation suit (5)
  • natco vs bayer (4)
  • need for transparency (1)
  • Novartis (8)
  • Novartis patent case in India (11)
  • NPEs (2)
  • nujs (1)
  • NUJS Conference (2)
  • Obituary (1)
  • obviousness (7)
  • Off-Topic (2)
  • online course (4)
  • Open Access (6)
  • Open Source (2)
  • Opposition (3)
  • Parallel Imports (4)
  • Parliament (1)
  • passing off (5)
  • Patent (52)
  • Patent act (10)
  • patent agent (5)
  • patent agent exam (9)
  • patent agent exam qualifications (3)
  • patent infringement (5)
  • Patent Licensing (2)
  • Patent litigation (2)
  • Patent Office (19)
  • patent pool (3)
  • Patent Prosecution (7)
  • Patent rules (2)
  • Patent Strategies (8)
  • Patents (9)
  • pegasus (1)
  • Personality Rights (1)
  • Pfizer (1)
  • Pharma (18)
  • Piracy (5)
  • plagiarism (3)
  • Plant Variety Protection (2)
  • post grant (1)
  • Prashant (2)
  • Preventive Detention (1)
  • Price Control (6)
  • prior publication (1)
  • Privacy (3)
  • Prizes (1)
  • public health (3)
  • Public Interest (4)
  • Publicity Rights (4)
  • Publishing (3)
  • radio (2)
  • Rajiv (18)
  • Rectification Petition (2)
  • Rejection (1)
  • research (3)
  • reverse engineering (2)
  • revocation (4)
  • rip (1)
  • Roche (2)
  • Roche vs Cipla (1)
  • Royalty (2)
  • RTI (2)
  • Scholarship (4)
  • section 16 (1)
  • Section 3(d) (7)
  • section 8 (6)
  • shamnad (11)
  • Shan Kohli (4)
  • Shouvik Kumar Guha (30)
  • Smartphones/Tablets (2)
  • Social Innovation (1)
  • Software (10)
  • software enforcement (3)
  • software patent (3)
  • Special 301 Report (1)
  • Spicy Tidbits (6)
  • spicyip (1)
  • SpicyIP Accolades (1)
  • SpicyIP Announcements (9)
  • SpicyIP Case (1)
  • SpicyIP Cases (3)
  • spicyip commiseration (1)
  • SpicyIP Events (11)
  • SpicyIP Fellowship (5)
  • SpicyIP Guest Series (22)
  • SpicyIP Interview (2)
  • SpicyIP Jobs (4)
  • SpicyIP Jobs/General (2)
  • SpicyIP Review (1)
  • SpicyIP Tidbits (11)
  • SpicyIP Weekly Review (27)
  • Statutory Licensing (1)
  • STI Policy 2013 (4)
  • Sugen (3)
  • Supreme Court of India (5)
  • Swaraj (19)
  • Tarnishment (1)
  • Technology (6)
  • Technology Transfer (5)
  • TKDL (5)
  • TPP (1)
  • trade (4)
  • Trade Secret Protection (1)
  • Trademark (59)
  • Trademark dilution (1)
  • Trademark Registry (9)
  • Traditional Knowledge (7)
  • Transparency (5)
  • treaty (1)
  • trial (1)
  • tribunals (2)
  • TRIPS (11)
  • UK (3)
  • unfair competition (5)
  • UNFCCC (1)
  • Universities Research and Innovation Bill (2)
  • US (1)
  • US Patent Reform (1)
  • US Supreme Court (3)
  • viva (3)
  • WIPO (5)
  • Working a Patent (2)
  • Workshop (4)
  • writ (1)
  • WTO (1)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (364)
    • ►  September (13)
    • ►  August (41)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (36)
    • ►  May (32)
    • ►  April (51)
    • ►  March (66)
    • ►  February (40)
    • ►  January (49)
  • ▼  2012 (131)
    • ►  December (29)
    • ►  November (42)
    • ►  October (50)
    • ▼  September (10)
      • Guest post: Jannat 2 - Producers far from Angelic
      • SpicyIP Weekly Review (September Week 4)
      • Access to Knowledge Platforms and Collaborative Ve...
      • FICCI announces online IPR course on pharmaceutica...
      • GoI criticised for failing to finalise the drug po...
      • SpicyIP Weekly Review (September Week 3)
      • Guest Post: Will the amendments to the Copyright A...
      • Guest post: Whirlpool v. Videocon
      • CSIR provides misleading information; aims to hide...
      • Academic Publishers: An Insider's View
Powered by Blogger.